Similar Questions for How did Colonists React To The Proclamation Of 1763 from Yahoo AnswersQuestionAnswer
After the French and Indian War ended in 1763, the French threat was removed. France had to give up her North American empire. The American colonists wanted to settle west of the Allegheny Mountains, especially in the Ohio Valley. But the British Parliament opposed this because they wanted to keep firmer control of the American colonists. Also they didn't want them to settle on Indian lands that would cause Indian revolts. They passed the Proclamation of 1763 prohibiting American settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Quartering Act gave the British permission to have their soldiers stationed in private American homes. But the main reason for the trouble between the British and the Ametrican colonists was that they wanted the Colonists to help pay for the previous French and Indian War. Each time Parliament taxed the Colonists they reacted violently.
An example of this was the Stamp Act. As far as trade is concerned the American merchants wanted to trade directly with the Caribbean without having to go through the British. I hope that this has been a help to you.
The war began in May 1763 when Native Americans, alarmed by policies imposed by British General Jeffrey Amherst, attacked a number of British forts and settlements. Eight forts were destroyed, and hundreds of colonists were killed or captured, with many more fleeing the region.
Hostilities came to an end after British Army expeditions in 1764 led to peace negotiations over the next two years. The Natives were unable to drive away the British, but the uprising prompted the British government to modify the policies that had provoked the conflict.
The colonists reacted to the Proclamation with anger and defiance. Defying the prohibition, thousands streamed westward beyond the imaginary boundary line drawn by he British. It was the first of a series of acts by the British government that were met with anger and resistance in the colonies. From the British point of view, each act was justified as a proper method for protecting its colonial empire and making the colonies pay their share of costs for sch protection From the colonist's point of view, each act represented an alarming threat to their cherished liberties and long-established practice of representative government.